Sunday, February 6, 2011

Science and Philosophy - 5

Today I read what I have written in the last three episodes of science discussion. I as well gave some details but, I felt I am leading nowhere. What are the three main points in the last three episodes what I am emphasizing 
1. Human has got logic and reasoning in his thinking 
2. With the help of above he discovered sciences, in the quest to find out truth of this universe, which are intertwined and also invented somethings which will be of use to him
3. Space is such a thing which relates everything


Further what I want to tell is about basics of sciences, why because - If we say computer and internet which are the ubiquitous end products for use and through which I am communicating my thoughts to my friends - just a glance of how the sciences involved in it
1. Computer uses binary coding and logic which is Maths
2. It uses integrated circuits with semi conductors, micro processors and basic function of circuits are the principles of physics
3. It uses semi conducting materials like Germanium, in circuits and transistors, which are discovered and the properties are specified by chemistry
4. Our biology is helping us to read this - further integration of this with biology leads to Androids (robots)/ Humanoids which, seemingly, will be a part of our life like toothbrush etc., in near future
Internet again uses all sciences and connects computer systems and also can be expressed same way.
And science is advancing so fast in the last century in leaps and bounds and specializations in each and every aspect, it is very difficult to follow science in all levels and in detail - I am just trying to give a glance of already what is unearthed to predict where it will lead to and what is its necessity and what in reality human needs - is it too much of science?? or is it GOD?? or a balance between science and GOD?? or is it simply science to GOD


Maths which is further classified into Arithmetic, Algebra, Geometry, Analysis based on its study of quantity , structure, space and change and is called Pure Mathematics, and Applied Mathematics is using the pure maths to solve problems of sciences and businesses.
Physics is study of matter and a natural science which is further divided into Mechanics, Electromagnetism, Thermodynamics, Quantum Mechanics, Relativity.
Chemistry into organic, inorganic, physical and analytical chemistry
Biology into Botany and Zoology and modern biology is based on principles like cell theory, evolution, genetics, homeostasis and energy


How to define human??
Human is basically composed of chemical materials like Carbon, Hydrogen, Oxygen and nitrogen mixed in mathematical proportions of definite nature and held together by laws of physics and universe - That is it??


Then how to define thought??


To be contd.......

4 comments:

  1. sir,
    so the conclusion is any thing is a product of science which is branched(diversified). I mean to say science is segemnted into diffrent sects and all these sects are cleverly put into use in different formats. So somewhere in the evolution human beings were made and they were made to learn all this stuff and apply ( case I) or human beings were made and they are now being led to the one who made them ( case 2)or A superior life exists which started all this creation and we are led to that superior life through science ( case 3)...
    any ways these are my immature lines which i discussed with my wife just now ( i dont have friends right here). She asked me " is everything all right?"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Mohan
    My conclusion is almost in line with your case 1 and it is like this - Human is the most superior being nature has evolved till date and he is one of the forms of brahman and variegated manifestation of brahman - who can think, reason and understand the nature which is brahman again -the sciences are the off shoots of extensive thinking, research and formulation of theories by human in his quest to truth and an attempt by the human to get control on nature both inner and outer - which he till date unable to achieve. Say ultimately one day even if human conquers the nature what he has to do with it - try for internal peace and create external surroundings which will help the same or damage his own entity by misusing the same- and as on date history is in line with the second one. As you said if Ramakrishna Paramahamsa has experienced and seen the superior force - what he did with that? whether all others can exercise the same control even after getting that immense power - or simply misuse so that this species is extinct even before the negative part of nature engulfs us -Hope I clarified- and now as the climax of my science advancement is spelled out the only thing in my further posts will be how i will justify this by giving current scientific scenario and where it is leading

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Mohan
    One more thing i missed to add above -on test basis i just tried and labelled the blog - i will categorize further as you suggested to get that flow which i also felt is correct- in short time - and thanks for the suggestion

    ReplyDelete
  4. sir,
    accept my greetings. I am student of Rama Krishna sir(1999-2000 x class batch)
    I have few things perhaps that may not fit the proceedings here.
    a) If this theory of yours gains currency and accepted them wickedness is a product of certain things which are not under the control of man. Isnt it easy for a evil doer to argue ( a hypothetical proposition) that his doings are not his but some things beyond his control( provided this theory becomes very much acceptable in the likes of shariyat etc.,)
    b) If the theory of Akash Shukla was also ultimate then there are many a infinite "space" in this ever expanding "space" ( thanks to big bang) and scope of same life form with same thoughts is imminent.
    c) when your realize your nature or you are in a position to separate yourself from your nature do we acquire super natural powers?
    d) if in his life time man cannot get to his nature man and his nature are separated at only one time ----death. isnt it?

    so many observations by me. thanks to you for you made a very complex subject open in simple yet powerful way. good day sir

    ReplyDelete